Oral Annual Conference of the Genetics Society of Australasia with the NZ Society for Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Myth or relict: Does ancient DNA detect the enigmatic Upland seal? (565)

Alexander T Salis 1 2 , Luke J Easton 1 , Bruce C Robertson 1 , Neil Gemmell 3 , Ian W Smith 4 , Marshall I Weisler , Jonathan Waters 1 , Nic J Rawlence 1
  1. Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  2. University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, Australia
  3. Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  4. Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

The biological status of the so-called ‘Upland seal’ has remained contentious ever since historical records described a distinct seal from the uplands of New Zealand’s (NZ) remote sub-Antarctic islands. Subsequent genetic surveys of the NZ fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) detected two highly-divergent mtDNA clades, hypothesized to represent a post-sealing hybrid swarm between ‘mainland’ (Australia– NZ; A. forsteri) and sub-Antarctic (putative ‘Upland’; A. snaresensis) lineages. We present the first ancient-DNA analyses of prehistoric mainland NZ and sub-Antarctic New Zealand fur seals, revealing that both genetic lineages were already widely distributed across the region at the time of human arrival. These findings indicate that anthropogenic factors did not contribute to the admixture of these divergent lineages, and cast doubt on the validity of the Upland seal. Human-mediated impacts on Arctocephalus genetic diversity are instead highlighted by a dramatic temporal haplotype frequency-shift due to genetic drift in heavily bottlenecked populations following the cessation of industrial-scale harvesting. Furthermore, significant population structuring was identified between Australia, New Zealand and the sub-Antarctic, with New Zealand further split into northern and southern groups with a zone of genetic disjunction, possibly resultant of a founder effect following recolonization. These extinction–recolonisation dynamics add to a growing picture of human-mediated change in NZ’s coastal and marine ecosystems.